![]() ![]() Reaper's been on the market now for about 12 years or so and I don't know if it will possess the stamina that Cakewalk has undergone seeing at least 3 or 4 changes of company ownership in the last 4 decades and still going strong. The good news is that most the basic functions and interface design have evolved and borrowed from earlier designs to become intuitive and logical once you gain a basic understanding. The program has been around since the early 80's so it has evolved into something of an industry standard. What's important for you, only you know, but there's no harm in putting both DAWs on the same system and testing them both out simultaneously.Īlso, there's literally thousands of Cakewalk Tutorials on Youtube for older versions as well as the latest, but sometimes the sheer number can make it difficult to find the one that you want. To me it matters, because I like to sometimes "borrow" a canned drum truck or bassline from an online MID file or simply to inspect those tracks in the Staff View in Cakewalk. It can do it, but it really messes them up in the process. I've used both and what I find severely lacking in Reaper is the ability to import and export MID format SMF files. Reaper and Cakewalk both cost nothing to try and use forever if you feel no guilt about being on your Day 6,478 of your evaluation with Reaper. ![]()
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |